tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5055165577627935888.post5615389565583908518..comments2023-06-23T03:53:40.428-07:00Comments on 200*: Too easy!Sharad Ragashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07568693092440484003noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5055165577627935888.post-25352003740238145662009-03-07T03:59:00.000-08:002009-03-07T03:59:00.000-08:00Of course... Just kidding anthe :)Of course... <BR/><BR/>Just kidding anthe :)Chaitanyahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04692624663356842072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5055165577627935888.post-8416456443992055302009-03-07T01:39:00.000-08:002009-03-07T01:39:00.000-08:00*Tongue in cheek**Tongue in cheek*Sharad Ragashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07568693092440484003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5055165577627935888.post-15504024973372305312009-03-07T01:38:00.000-08:002009-03-07T01:38:00.000-08:00I was actually jus about to write on this match.. ...I was actually jus about to write on this match.. but you beat me to it. =)<BR/><BR/>But I dont think it is being sexist to call it the Women's World Cup.. primarily coz the generic "world cup" term had been popularized previously by their male counterparts. It is not a social commentary on any sort of discrimination but merely an unfortunate victim of some sort of parachronism. Surely, the just and tolerant English (of Wimbledon Tennis fame) cannot be accused of such and such.. =)Sharad Ragashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07568693092440484003noreply@blogger.com